roadkill » 08 Jun 2018 7:10 am » wrote:Misty » 07 Jun 2018 8:13 pm » wrote:Yeah, we've heard that before and all we've gotten so far are a bunch of nothingburgers.
Where's Nunes?
He never said a word about 'Spygate' after the DOJ briefing.
Gowdy, who actually attended the briefing, said that the FBI did exactly what they should have done.
I remember when you were pushing the collusion narrative hard...don't hear much about that anymore.

First of all, I was never pushing the collusion narrative hard.
I have said from the very beginning that this was more likely to be about money, and that seems to be where it is headed.
Looks like all of them were out to make money from the campaign, just like many of them are now trying to capitalize on the presidency.
For many of them, (like Flynn, Manafort and Cohen) this has been a money making effort from the get go.
Secondly, the collusion is obvious.
Everybody was meeting with Russians to either get dirt on Hillary or make back room deals, but there is no such crime as collusion.
Whether or not it rises to the level of conspiracy, which would be a crime, is yet to be seen.
Neither you nor I know what evidence Mueller has, which is why I find the Cult45 talking point that there is absolutely no evidence of collusion hilarious.
And like I said, the evidence of collusion is already out there.
See Donald Trump Junior's emails pertaining to the June, 2016 Trump Tower meeting with the Russians.
You know, the meeting they said was about Russian adoption.
P.S.The term 'Russian adoption' is code for sanctions.