Liberal Forum

Misty » 16 Jan 2019 12:26 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 16 Jan 2019 7:34 am » wrote:Even liberal commentators admitted it wasn't a Blue Wave, Dim.

Yes, your party gained the House.

But it lost a Senate seat.

And made minimal gains in governorships.

Congrats, you won back Illinois and kept Connecticutt. Now Democrats will be in charge as they continue to collapse into literal bankruptcy.

Considering the partisan way that Congressional districts are gerrymandered, 40 seats is a **** tsunami.

****. You don't take into account gerrymandering by your party; California, NY, Illinois, etc.

Or the fact that the Pennsylvania court illegally gerrymandered in that state.
The only real surprise in governor's races was Kansas. Mostly your party made gains in Blue States.
Big freaking deal.

There were 10 Democrats running for Senate in states that 45 won.
Dems should have lost most of those.
They did not.

Oh, so it was a Blue Wave because you didn't lose more Senate seats.

That only makes sense to a wackjob.

It was a first term off year election. The in power party almost always loses seats.

It was not a Blue Wave, Dim.