User avatar
Nobody
11 May 2019 2:17 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 11 May 2019 12:04 pm » wrote:
Clem: No illegal collusion.
Misty: The Mueller report never dealt with 'collusion.' There is no such crime.
How freaking stupid to babble about meaningless semantic differences. :\
Trump didn't commit any crimes relative to Russia, nor did any of his officials.
The Mueller report cited 251 contacts between members of the campaign and Russian operatives.
He and his officials willingly accepted help from a foreign adversary that made it clear that they wanted to help Trump and hurt Hillary. (See Junior's emails.)

Technically that may not be a crime, but it sure as hell is unethical and improper to say the least.
But you don't give a **** about that you **** unpatriotic, un-American piece of ****.

Instead of condemning the actions of Trump and his criminal enterprise, you attack the people who were looking into what Russia was doing to **** with our democracy, and whether or not members of his campaign who were meeting with all these Russians and lying about it, were involved in some kind of a conspiracy.

The FBI would have been delinquent had they not investigated that ****.

What if China decides in 2020 that they want to help the Democratic candidate and hurt Trump, and that Dem candidate waved around a bunch of hacked and stolen RNC emails, and constantly praised Xi Jinping while members of his or her campaign secretly met with a bunch of Chinese operatives and lied about it?

Do you think the FBI should look into that or not?

After what Trump has put them through, I wouldn't blame them if they decided not to investigate it.
They witnessed what happened to their collegues who lost their careers and had their reputations destroyed.

Why should they take that chance?
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search