Liberal Forum

crimsongulf » 15 May 2019 4:53 pm » wrote:

Misty » 15 May 2019 4:43 pm » wrote:I don't believe you, liar.
What part of "I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred" do you not understand?
He's trying to straddle the fence.
He knows there was no improper surveillance, but he has to look into it anyway just to satisfy the whining manbaby in the WH.
This AG is a disgrace.

So, how do you explain getting a FISA warrant based on a fictional dossier paid for by the Clinton campaign?

I don't have to explain something that did not happen.

The Russia investigation began after the FBI learned that George Papadopoulos, had been approached by a Russian agent, and the agent told Papadopoulos that the Russians had incriminating information about Hillary Clinton, including emails.

Papadopoulos then mentioned to an Australian diplomat that the Russians had dirt on Clinton, and the Australians contacted the U.S. government, and the FBI began to take a look.

The dossier formed only a smart part of the evidence used to meet the legal burden of establishing probable cause that Carter Page was an agent of Russia.

Page was playing footsie with Russians for years before Trump even declared his run for the presidency.
It's not the first time he was suspected of being a Russian asset.

This **** about the origins of the investigation, or as Trump calls them the 'oranges' of the investigation, is a bunch of crap used as a defection from what really happened.

There were Russians all over the place reaching out to members of the Trump campaign, saying they wanted to help Trump and offering dirt on Hillary.
Members of the campaign were secretly meeting with those Russians, and they all lied about it.
The FBI would have been delinquent in their duties not to investigate that.