Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 17 May 2019 12:01 pm » wrote:

crimsongulf » 15 May 2019 4:53 pm » wrote:So, how do you explain getting a FISA warrant based on a fictional dossier paid for by the Clinton campaign?

I don't have to explain something that did not happen.

Except that sworn testimony reveals that without the unverified dossier, they could not have gotten the FISA warrant.

Whose sworn testimony?
Link?

Termin8tor » 17 May 2019 12:01 pm » wrote:And it will soon be revealed that the rest of the "information" used was even less reputable.

I won't hold my breath.

Termin8tor » 17 May 2019 12:01 pm » wrote:And guess what, it's a violation of federal law, a felony, to use unverified information to apply for a FISA warrant.
Indictments are coming, and they won't be for Process Crimes.

Again, not holding my breath.

Your whole timeline is off Precious.

The FBI opened its counterintelligence investigation at the end of July, 2016.
They did not file an application with the FISA Court, looking for authority to secretly monitor Carter Page’s communications until October 21, 2016.

FYI, Carter Page was on the FBI's radar since 2013 when he shared information and research with a Russian national whom the FBI later accused of being a Kremlin spy.
That's why they took another look at him when he showed up as an adviser to the Trump campaign.
They would have been delinquent not to.

The Russia probe: A timeline from Moscow to Mueller