User avatar
Huey
8 Sep 2019 6:04 pm
User avatar
      
36,579 posts
Misty » 08 Sep 2019 6:00 pm » wrote:
crimsongulf » 08 Sep 2019 4:15 pm » wrote:From Wednesday, August 28, through Monday, September 2, the information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama. This is clearly demonstrated in Hurricane Advisories #15 through #41, which can be viewed at the following link.

The Birmingham National Weather Service’s Sunday morning tweet spoke in absolute terms that were inconsistent with probabilities from the best forecast products available at the time.

https://www.noaa.gov/news/statement-from-noaa
Misty » 08 Sep 2019 2:39 pm » wrote:I called **** on this unsigned statement from NOAA and it looks like I was right.

Image
NOAA staff were reportedly warned against publicly contradicting Trump about his claim that Hurricane Dorian would hit Alabama.

Staff at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration received an odd, agency-wide warning from a top official just hours after President Donald Trump sparked widespread confusion by tweeting that Alabama could be hit by Hurricane Dorian, The Washington Post reported Saturday evening.

The official's September 1 directive told employees not to "provide any opinion" and to "only stick with the official National Hurricane Center forecasts if questions arise from some national level social media posts which hit the news this afternoon," according to an email obtained by The Post.

The "national level social media posts" in question were widely understood within the NOAA to refer to Trump's tweet, one meteorologist told The Post.

But before the memo was sent out to NOAA staff, the National Weather Service's Birmingham office had already refuted Trump's tweet, clarifying that Alabama would "NOT see any impacts from the hurricane."

"This is the first time I've felt pressure from above to not say what truly is the forecast," the meteorologist told The Post.

The person continued: "It's hard for me to wrap my head around.

One of the things we train on is to dispel inaccurate rumors and ultimately that is what was occurring — ultimately what the Alabama office did is provide a forecast with their tweet, that is what they get paid to do."
So NOAA was warned not to contradict Trump's Tweets even if he was wrong.

The National Weather Service's Birmingham office had already refuted Trump's tweet before they got the memo and were thrown under the bus for it.

The orange skidmark has actually managed to politicize the weather now.

Sorry, advisories 15-41 refuted the office as well as the map I posted.

Carry on.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search