23 May 2020 11:04 am
...in order to truly 'comm'unicate we must have a 'comm'on understanding of words/definitions/concepts...i believe 'anarchy' to be an impossibility...'an' a prefix meaning 'without'...'archy' = rule..so literally, 'anarchy' = 'without rule'... it is my understanding that with humans there are always going to be 'rules'...it's what we do...for example, i think you understand that if USFEDGOV left right now there would be all kinds of **** looking to 'rule'...maybe a 'local strongman'...maybe the hell's angels on the highways...etc. gangs galore...Polar1ty » 20 May 2020, 12:29 am » wrote: ↑Actually the best libertarians became "market anarchists" - neither left-wing nor right-wing - and they oppose corporate power just as much as state power.peepee » 19 May 2020, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ ...i can certainly understand your distaste...the nets are chock-full of orange-mouthed republican-radio-level assholes who call themselves 'libertarian'...[ime, most of them are merely goddamned fool republicans who smoke dope]
...btw, it is my understanding that the best 'libertarians' left 'the libertarian party' after the **** republicans took the party over in 2008 and nominated for president the republican asshole, bob barf...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-market_anarchism
...as a 'minarchist' i support 'minimum rule'... VIGOROUSLY DEBATED transparent, EGALITARIAN 'rules'...