Blackvegetable » 19 Apr 2021, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑
Huey » 19 Apr 2021, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑
@Blackvegetable
That is how you make an argument. Note the lack of questions and a point. You are not man enough.
It's the kind of **** you would swallow as "argument".
Note the lack of questions
Duh....it's a **** MONOLOGUE, moron.
and a point.
A slogan.
Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑
Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑
The OP is about OAN. You are on the wrong thread, *******. I am not interested in your whine from yesterday.
Where is your arguments and quotes you claimed you would post on this thread? No argument so far.
You make the same complaint about EVERYTHING, EVERYWHERE, Stalky.
The assertion
"There are too many in circulation"
is neither argument, nor evidence...it is SUBJECTIVE ("too many")...who died and made that idiot Counting Boss.
But it is even more idiotic than that.
It has become a consistent theme from ammosexuals
"We can't do anything about guns because there are "too many" in circulation."
In short, after some 50 years of imposing nonsense readings of the 2nd Amendment, the nation is reaping the "rewards"..now the same idiots who got us here insist that nothing can be done about the mess they created - in their celebrated judgment.
50 years of **** assertions promoted as "arguments".
Your ranting is cheese. You call that an argument?
I am assuming you meant to place this here. Lets examine your "arguments".
There are too many in circulation. That is a simple fact. Banning Magazines with a capacity between 10-20 rounds will have no affect on mass shootings. None. Can you explain how it will? This Cheese Bill is knee jerk reaction by left wing politicians that ignorant anti gun nuts like you swallow hook, line and sinker. Plus, moron, the bill will not touch those that are in circulation. Nod if you understand that. If there are 300 million out there right now (probably a helluva lot more) there still will be that many AFTER the bill passes.
**** idiot.
@Blackvegetable