User avatar
Blackvegetable
21 Apr 2021 11:34 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
59,315 posts
Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ It is not reducing availability.  Those hundreds of millions out there are available and will not be affected by the law.  They will still be legal.  Nod if you understand.  If you already have them you are not breaking the law.  

This law does nothing.  It is cheese. And as I stated, as in the VA Tech shooting you claimed was not relevant, some who is going to do that just brings more magazines.  Nod if you understand.
You just rebleat the same stupid ****, over and over..

Let's reduce this to your argument:


There shall be no laws proposed having anything to do with firearms because there are too many.


Let's roll with the Utter Mindwarping Idiocy of this proposition.


Say the objective IS to reduce the supply...


Are you more likely to succeed in doing so by continuing to manufacture the item whose supply you seek to control, or by curtailing such manufacture?



 
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search