Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 11:34 am

You just rebleat the same stupid ****, over and over..

Let's reduce this to your argument:

There shall be no laws proposed having anything to do with firearms because there are too many.

Let's roll with the Utter Mindwarping Idiocy of this proposition.

Say the objective IS to reduce the supply...

Are you more likely to succeed in doing so by continuing to manufacture the item whose supply you seek to control, or by curtailing such manufacture?

Let's reduce this to your argument:

That is not my argument.  Try again.  


If you had read the information before making comments the fact that "too many are out there" refers to the portion of the bill that keeps them LEGALLY in circulation.  Doesn't matter if it is 50 million or 300 million.  The bill will only affect new purchases.  And since there are 100s of millions already out there this particular bill is worthless.  

Next, as the VA Tech shooting demonstrates, those inclined to do this will just bring MORE magazines.  Only takes a second to change.  So the bill is worthless in that regard.  

You have, as usual, misrepresented my argument because you can not what I am actually arguing.  

What else ya go?