Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 7:25 am

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 7:19 am

Post your counter argument to the topic and the argument I presented it.

Or start a thread where you can divert all you like.

Post your counter argument to the topic and the argument I presented it.

you have not posted an argument...I addressed the "points" in your rant.

Nod if you understand.

Or start a thread where you can divert all you like.

Are these your words, witless little ****?

You either live by the rule or you don't.  

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:26 pm

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:36 pm

You're dumber than ****.....

Never, ever presume to dwarfslpain ANYTHING to anyone

So, we have destroyed your alleged counter argument concerning the number of magazines in circulation that will not fall under the law.  Let's move onto another point I made you did not address, simply calling it irrelevant which is your code that you have no clue what is being discussed.

Let's say this cheese law manages to pass.  Meaning no more magazines with 10 + round capacity.  You with me so far?  We will not be discussing clips. 

In this REAL world example I own a 380 EZ that I carry.  It is an 8+1 weapon.  I know you are not schooled in the terminology. That means the magazine carries 8 but I have one chambered when I carry it.  That is the +1 meaning I have nine ready to go.  In my front pocket I have another 8 round magazine.  That means I have 17 rounds.  Remember, it takes a second to change.  That is normally what I carry.

Now if I wanted too I could carry more.  I don't but I could.  I could put 2 magazines in each pocket.  That would be 4 mags x 8 =32.  You with me so far?  So, with the 9 in the weapon we are up to 41.  But wait, there is more.  

I have a shoulder holster I wear sometimes that has two magazine pouches.  Usually in the winter under a jacket.  Two more 8 round magazines = 16.  16 plus 41 is 57.  And no one would ever know.  And it is all perfectly legal under the law you support.  

So according to the law you support a person who was inclined (I am not) to do so could effectively shoot 57 people and the law has done nothing to stop it.  Just like the VA Tech shooting you claimed was irrelevant.  

That is how a man makes an argument Mr. Irrelevant.  I gave you a realistic REAL world example.