Liberal Forum

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 11:15 am

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 11:08 am

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 10:06 am

As you would say this is my thread.  I am simply going down fork in the road you took.  Plus, I added the part of the AR 15 story YOU always leave out.

Next, today's AR 15s are not the AER 15 Sporter of 1964.  Different manufactures, different design, etc.

Since you are stuck on the name I will not argue with you concerning the AR 15 Sporter.  Your argument does not pertain to any modern day weapon.  Here is the pic:



But not this one.  It is a Ruger 556, not related to Armalite, the M16, or the AR 15 Sporter.  It was designed specifically for civilian use.  

It's uncanny...


 

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 11:10 am

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 9:27 am

As usual, you leave out part of the story. Colt purchased the AR 15 from Amarillite when they ran out of money.  After some tweaks it was sold to the Military as teh M16.  Colt retained the copyright for the name.  Then designed a Semi Auto specifically for civilians and Law Enforcement.  A single shot per trigger squeeze.  They needed to name it something so they used the AR 15 name.  

If that weapon was the same as the M16 it never would have gotten the blessing of the Government o market it specifically to civilians. 

Modern Rifles are designed specifically for civilians and have no battlefield applications.  

We can stop right there. 

And you can stop with the Forrest Gump routine and return to the topic you are diverting from.

it is not relevant to the question.

Learn to focus, loser....perhaps the Streak might end.
 


 

Learn to focus.  You argument is the AR 15 Sporter should be banned because you claim it was designed for the battlefield because you claim it comes from the M16 family.  Well go ahead and ban it.  You are wrong but go for it.  

The weapon I posted is not a colt, not related to the sporter or the M16 and was not based on a design for the battelfield.  It was designed SPECIFICALLY for civilian use.  Not the battlefield.  You using your faulty logic it is a good weapon. 

 

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 11:17 am

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 11:15 am

Learn to focus.  You argument is the AR 15 Sporter should be banned because you claim it was designed for the battlefield because you claim it comes from the M16 family.  Well go ahead and ban it.  You are wrong but go for it.  

The weapon I posted is not a colt, not related to the sporter or the M16 and was not based on a design for the battelfield.  It was designed SPECIFICALLY for civilian use.  Not the battlefield.  You using your faulty logic it is a good weapon.

The Sporter plays no part in MY argument.

We need not go any further..