Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
The latest house bill on gun control is cheese
23 Apr 2021 11:57 am
Answer the question, dumb ****..Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ That is unverified. The 3 at the end of the fandom wiki leads to the footnotes. When you click the 3rd one it goes to a site that is no longer active. So, it is unverified.
The sporter was not designed for the battlefield. If that were the case they would not have needed the M 16
The sporter was not designed for the battlefield. If that were the case they would not have needed the M 16.
Why did the need the Sporter, on conversely the M16. According to you they are both battlefield weapons. According to you they are exactly the same. So why did they need to design two separate weapons. With extremely different functions and parts?
Makes no sense from a business standpoint.
What do you call this, you oblivious **** brick?The sporter was not designed for the battlefield. If that were the case they would not have needed the M16.