Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑
Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑
Yes.....they ALL contradict you...
Not one supports you.
No...that's what I've been doing, **** idiot..
You don't answer questions, Quimmy, and only occasionally respond.
You are too ignorant of the subject to understand the level of curb stomping that you just suffered. The Sportier is referred as a civilian rifle. As I have demonstrated anything that made the M 16 a battlefield weapon was removed and redesigned. Completely changing the function of the weapon. Different barrel, lower receiver, bolt, trigger assemble, ammunition etc.
Next, if the Sporter was a battlefield weapon that would have been sold to the military instead of the M16 OR the M16 would have been sold to civilians.
Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑
Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑
You are too ignorant of the subject to understand the level of curb stomping that you just suffered. The Sportier is referred as a civilian rifle. As I have demonstrated anything that made the M 16 a battlefield weapon was removed and redesigned. Completely changing the function of the weapon. Different barrel, lower receiver, bolt, trigger assemble, ammunition etc.
Next, if the Sporter was a battlefield weapon that would have been sold to the military instead of the M16 OR the M16 would have been sold to civilians.
If Colt wanted to sell a sporting semi-automatic rifle to civilians - of its own design - why pay Armalite for the DESIGN?
DMA.
They did not pay Armalite for the Design of the Sporter. They paid Armalite for the design of the Armalite 10/15 in 1959, a battlefield automatic weapon. The Colt Sporter did not come around until 1964.
But the point is moot. The Sporter went out of production 40 years ago. Today's semi autos are not related to it and are not designed for the battlefield, as the Sporter was not designed for the battlefield.