7 Mar 2024 2:33 pm
Okay, Clarrence Narrow - we'll accept the expertise of the dumbest **** in the thread.
To start new they would need a new indictment. They already HAVE an indictment, so getting a new one would be improper.
Prosecuting under the existing one means taking the existing case, *** grease and all, and running THAT slippery ball over the goal line, delivering it to an appellate court with all of fani's funk on it.
You need to focus on the attorneys' tits, sloe. You're WAY the **** out of your wheelhouse.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?