7 Mar 2024 4:04 pm
I don't know if you're right or not, but I sure as **** love the way you said it!!!Cannonpointer » 07 Mar 2024, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Okay, Clarrence Narrow - we'll accept the expertise of the dumbest **** in the thread.
To start new they would need a new indictment. They already HAVE an indictment, so getting a new one would be improper.
Prosecuting under the existing one means taking the existing case, *** grease and all, and running THAT slippery ball over the goal line, delivering it to an appellate court with all of fani's funk on it.
You need to focus on the attorneys' tits, sloe. You're WAY the **** out of your wheelhouse.
