R.Suave » 14 Mar 2024, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑
The two witnesses weren't testifying to the rape. They were testifying to having been told of it by Carroll at the time it occurred.
That is not hearsay.
Seriously, you're an idiot.
What they testified to was hearsay.
All they had was the moonbat's word that what she claims happened actually happened.
The had zero proof that anything actually occurred.
Like I said, I could tell your neighbor that I saw you **** a goat... and by your logic, you were actually **** that goat,
because your neighbor testifies that somebody told them you were.
THAT is hearsay, and should have never even been allowed as any type of evidence in the case.
Brown clown.
Now what about these fingerprints you claimed Carroll had?
Your words...
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people