Liberal Forum

RedheadedStranger » 14 Mar 2024, 6:32 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 6:32 pm

They testified that they heard something... and had zero way of knowing if what they heard was true or not.

By definition, that's hearsay.

​​​​​​Are you just being obtuse or are you really this **** stupid?

I'm going with the latter.

And YOU are the one that mentioned "fingerprints"... not me... as evidenced by the quote.

Your words.

nod

(now strike it through and accept your *** whooping like a good little bitch)

You're so **** thick.

They only testified to what they knew, specifically that Carroll told them about the incident when it occurred. That was the ONLY purpose of their appearance. Not the details, just the fact that she told them at the time.

Can you grasp this?

**** *******.