14 Mar 2024 10:29 pm
Cannonpointer » 14 Mar 2024, 10:18 pm » wrote: ↑ If a CEO allows humanity to stand between the company and a nickel, he is subject to civil and criminal penalties.
He has a fiduciary obligation to the stock holders. "But the children" is not an excuse for failing to maximize profits.
Do you know of any specific cases where that was the direct cause of action against the CEO?
I'm not challenging your premise at all.
But I do think if that happened, it would be cloaked in ****.
A simple peon like me wouldn't hear about it very easily.
All I hear is "What about the children? They are our future. We care- read our mission statement."
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.