Liberal Forum

Huey » 04 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm

This is a joke, right?

PS. Remember the last time you guys ranted about the AL comment I told you the original tracks had it crossing FL and heading to the Gulf. In a northwest direction? Look at the map and see where AL is. Seems to me you just down your own argument.

Huey » 05 Sep 2019, 6:40 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2019, 6:40 pm

Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2019 6:27 pm » wrote:

Huey » 05 Sep 2019 12:20 pm » wrote:
Sorry, the track on the map has the storm heading over lake Okeechobee towards the northwest and the gulf. That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.

You wanna discuss stupid? Look in the mirror and see your face.

Boldly Defining something you are vaguely describing?

There was no such "early track" from any official weather service.

We know where The Grifter got it....now he's just Dwarfsplainin'.

So now you lie when busted. There certainly was. Just stop.

From aug 30:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.montgo ... 2164905001

, from the 29th ya **** moron:



Link:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.orland ... P%2520HTML

LMMFAO!! You see the track and the green portion. **** you.

The image from noaa says you are a lying moron. JUST AS I SAID. LMMFAO!!!!!

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2021, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2021, 9:03 am

Huey » 14 Jun 2021, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2021, 9:02 am

Where is the link?

Are these your words

Sorry, the track on the map has the storm heading over lake Okeechobee towards the northwest and the gulf. That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.

You wanna discuss stupid? Look in the mirror and see your face.