Huey » 05 Sep 2019, 6:40 pm » wrote: ↑So now you lie when busted. There certainly was. Just stop.[url=https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1265384#p1265384 » wrote:Blackvegetable»05Sep20196:27pm[/url]]Boldly Defining something you are vaguely describing?[url=https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1265284#p1265284 » wrote:Huey»05Sep201912:20pm[/url]]
Sorry, the track on the map has the storm heading over lake Okeechobee towards the northwest and the gulf. That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.
You wanna discuss stupid? Look in the mirror and see your face.
There was no such "early track" from any official weather service.
We know where The Grifter got it....now he's just Dwarfsplainin'.
From aug 30:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.montgo ... 2164905001
, from the 29th ya **** moron:
Link:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.orland ... P%2520HTML
LMMFAO!! You see the track and the green portion. **** you.
The image from noaa says you are a lying moron. JUST AS I SAID. LMMFAO!!!!!
Huey » 05 Sep 2019, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑Sorry, the track on the map has the storm heading over lake Okeechobee towards the northwest and the gulf. That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.[url=https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1265282#p1265282 » wrote:Blackvegetable»05Sep201912:18pm[/url]]What map would you use to show a storm's path up the Atlantic coast of Florida that did NOT show Alabama to the northwest?[url=https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1265276#p1265276 » wrote:Huey»05Sep201912:13pm[/url]]
The one in the OP, without the sharpie.
You should read the thread before starting **** with others.
Face of Stupid.
You wanna discuss stupid? Look in the mirror and see your face.