Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2021, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑
Huey » 02 Aug 2021, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑
Your beach pic. Epic Fail.
Number of kids she has. Your next epic fail.
Your attempt to argue stand your ground, Epic Fail.
The salary she made, Epic Fail.
All inventions.
When the pic is posted, you're gonna go on about how "it's not a beach", as foretold.
You will ignore all the other details I have right.
Whether your wife had 2 or 3 is not, nor has it ever been, an issue..
Your stand your ground citations SUPPORT me....unambiguously..
She didn't make enough to carry either 3 OR 2..
My bet is that she waited until she maxed out support, alimony or both.
It has to be a beach, with my wife behind me and slightly elevated on sand dune and I am flexing in profile. That pic does not exist. Or, it is a pic of someone else.
As far as her kids it was a big enough issue for you to bring it up and claim my recall sucked. then when you are wrong it suddenly isn't an issue.
No, it did not support you. The problem is YOU were the aggressor in your scenario. You were not in danger of imminent death or severe bodily harm. It is a self defense law, not a license to indiscriminately shoot people.
She didn't make enough to carry either 3 OR 2..
You will have to prove that. As usual, you are full of ****.