4 Jul 2024 7:08 am
The court sent the challenges to the federal firearms bans back down to a lower court with instructions to review the case in light of their ruling last month in US v. Rahimi.Blackvegetable » 04 Jul 2024, 6:42 am » wrote: ↑ Crawling artlessly from the wreckage of Bruen.
Supreme Court declines to hear a series of challenges to laws barring felons and drug users from having guns
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/02/politics ... reme-court
“At least for now, the court seems unwilling to jump right back into the messy fight that it touched off two years ago in the Bruen case with respect to exactly what the Second Amendment does and doesn’t prohibit,” said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at Georgetown University Law Center.
“But the punt here is necessarily temporary; lower courts are already bitterly divided over how they’re supposed to review a number of different state and federal gun control laws,” Vladeck added. “It’s a good bet that, before their next term is over, the justices are going to have to step back in.”
Inferior courts will TORTURE Free Ride. Bruen was composed by a child.
https://youtu.be/WrURe9s572I?si=FMH3-4O5M2eNP9Pv
Prediction: Vegas will have no idea what this is about, either.
I guess the lower courts need to do their job...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."