Blackvegetable » 07 Jul 2024, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑
yes, you did. As succinctly explained.
Tiny,
The case isn't falling apart.
The law may have been changed AFTER the case was successfully argued before a jury.
If his convictions are qualified by immunity, it doesn't change any of the facts established in court.
You continue to put faith in people whose analyses have been CONSISTENTLY WRONG for decades.
Can you think of a single one I've missed?
Yeah, we know what you are saying.
We will find out in September and then on appeal. But the fact you need to come to grips with is not enough care about his conviction. And you have bigger problems to worry about. Like a candidate.