No, no - you give ME a break.
What you were commenting on is contextualized by who you were commenting TO.
You brought up jews, and you have implicitly admitted that you tried to derail the thread by REDIRECTING me to comment exclusively on what you "meant," rather than commenting on what the OP is talking about.
You and you alone want to make this about your backyard and my imaginary RV - about your EARNED, OWNED equipment and not the stolen **** the OP is talking about.
I wasn't being nice, or fair, and I need to GIVE YOU A BREAK, because my response to your post kept the OP's context instead of going along with your shabby attempt to ignore it and recontextualize the conversation.
Here's the thing: If you want to disagree with his contentions, nut up and do it without the passive aggression of a cheap contextual reframe that you will then demand I limit my response within.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?