And did that confute the OP? Was it INTENDED to confute the OP? To agree with/cosign the OP?
What was the INTENTION of your post? I will tell you mine. MY post was intended to SUPPORT the OP.
You could only have had three possible motives for your post:
1. To support the OP - in which case you and I are of one accord;
2. To refute the OP - in which case, my response to you was on point, since I support the OP; and
3. To derail the thread/passive-aggressively and sneakily confute the OP - and then demand that I respond EXCLUSIVELY within the limits of the passive/aggressive reframe, thus derailing the OP without truly addressing it.
Just tell me which one of those motives you had, and we might settle on whether my response to you was called for, sir.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?