Silverfox » 16 Feb 2014 8:21 am » wrote:
They show GDP for the years prior to Carter (so that you can show how wonderful everything was then) through the Carter years (to show how he drove the economy into the ground) through to the end of Reagan (to show how he heroically saved the world).
It give GPD by year as well as showing GDP growth by year (as you wanted) and average GDP per capita, by year.
Surely you could cobble together some support for your argument from that?
If not, maybe you could provide
something to support your claims?
No, I don't waste my time
for moonbats who stonewall my questions and my points, as you have every time.
It would be a complete and utter waste of time.
This is not a matter of debate or dispute. No one with the slightest knowledge or common sense would claim that Carter was better on the economy than Reagan.
No one.