User avatar
Cannonpointer
16 Feb 2014 12:32 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,426 posts
RichClem » 16 Feb 2014 6:09 am » wrote:
Hilarious that the psychotic is standing by this stunningly stupid claim.

But he must have an absolutely impeccable source, having rejected every one of mine!

about.com

:huh:

Let's see more of the wisdom and subject matter carried by his source. CP would never, EVER cite a questionable source!

Wow, they have a candy "expert!"

And an expert on grandfathers!

Then they must be experts on Economics and history, too! :clap:

I love psychotic moonbat humor! :rofl:
So, you make no claim that my source is partisan - just that they are not entirley political in their reportage?

And you post no alternative numbes. You do not disagree with my numbers, AT ALL. You merely make weak attempts to mock my source - again, not by any claim of partisanship and not by any claim of inaccuracy. Just by an irrelevant ad hominem.

So you got nothin?

K. :) That's one contard down - didn't even TRY.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search