RichClem » 16 Feb 2014 6:09 am » wrote:
Hilarious that the psychotic is standing by
this stunningly stupid claim.
But he must have an absolutely impeccable source, having rejected every one of mine!
about.com
Let's see more of the wisdom and subject matter carried by his source. CP would never, EVER cite a questionable source!
Wow, they have a candy "expert!"
And an expert on grandfathers!
Then they must be experts on Economics and history, too!
I love psychotic moonbat humor!

So, you make no claim that my source is partisan - just that they are not entirley political in their reportage?
And you post no alternative numbes. You do not disagree with my numbers, AT ALL. You merely make weak attempts to mock my source - again, not by any claim of partisanship and not by any claim of inaccuracy. Just by an irrelevant ad hominem.
So you got nothin?
K.

That's one contard down - didn't even TRY.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?