tharock220 » 16 Feb 2014 12:51 pm » wrote:
Hey I'll be the first to admit numbers can be used in basically any way that suits your needs. The OP is a prime example of that. The point is that anecdotes are not an effective form of debate when talking about something like a President's success.
There's a remedy for that sideswipe to the OP. Present alternative numbers or an alternative explanation for those numbers. Just remember to incorporate Post # 4 in your critique, since it goes on to break down raw debt vs. debt to GDP ratio - reagan loses either way, of course - but the second way accounts for reagan's failure to keep the dollar sound (inflation).
The numbers speak against the conservative MSM narrative. I have clearly demonstrated that. If you can save the narrative, then by all means, do get busy. Hold your end, son.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?