golfboy » 16 Feb 2014 1:29 pm » wrote:
I just used your own numbers to show you lied.
Open wide and swallow your failure.
Prepare to have your *** kicked by your own numbers again.
1977 4.6
1978 5.6
1979 3.2
1980 -0.2
1981 2.6
Your graph shows Carter's number at 3.4% average growth during his Presidency
1977 through 1980 (4.6 + 5.6 + 3.2 + -0.2) / 4 = 3.4
1978 through 1981 (5.6 + 3.2 + -
0.2 + 2.6) / 4 = 2.8
According to your own graph, in order to get a 3.4% gdp, Carter took an economy running at 4.6% and handed it off at
-0.2%
Make up your mind. In your math, you show
-0.2 as the third number, using the October fiscal year as the measuring stick. But in your follow-on explanation, you use
-0.2 as the hand-off year, using the election year as the measuring stick. This type of mathematical mishmash is poor presentation, son.
I will get to your presentation soon, so please: Try to refine it in the interim, make it less dishonest.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?