Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 16 Feb 2014 1:24 pm » wrote: That's funny. Two of Ford's last three years were in the negative, and you characterized that as a "stable, growing economy."

And no source to back that up. Typical.

Looks to me as if Carter inherited a decent economy.

Any other bulls*** you'd like to pass off?

ONE of Carter's last three years was MARGINALLY negative, and you characterize that in terms just short of apocalyptic.

You seem to be a bit of a hack, clemtard.

Meaning you have no idea about the idea of the momentum and timing of an economy.

You're in so far over your head, you can't even see daylight.