Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
CARTER GREW THE ECONOMY MUCH BETTER THAN REAGAN
16 Feb 2014 2:01 pm
That depends on whether you're going to understand that you have yourself backed into a Keynesian corner, contard (needed the alliteration - sorry).crimsongulf » 16 Feb 2014 12:59 pm » wrote:
So, are you saying that we would have been better off with Carter? If so, how do you think he would have changed history.
If you factor in that Reagan almost doubled the economy using 2 TRILLION DOLLARS OF DEBT, then "you" and "we" are better off for it, so long as "you" and "we" does not include the precious, precious unborn.
You guys want to have it both ways and then the third way. WHEN YOU PULL REAGAN'S TWO TRILLION BORROWED DOLLARS OUT OF THE ECONOMY, he added less than 400 billion in 8 years - LESS THAN INFLATION.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?