Liberal Forum

RichClem » 16 Feb 2014 1:42 pm » wrote:
And no source to back that up. Typical.

Looks to me as if Carter inherited a decent economy.

http://useconomy.about.com/od/GDP-by-Ye ... istory.htm

Here are the growth numbers for 73-76 - what Carter inherited:

73: +5.6
74: -0.5
75: -0.2
76: +5.4

Here's 77 - 80 - What Reagan inherited:

77: +4.6
78: +5.6
79: +3.2
80: -.02

Now, then.

What were you saying?

RichClem » 16 Feb 2014 1:42 pm » wrote:Any other bulls*** you'd like to pass off?

Meaning you have no idea about the idea of the momentum and timing of an economy.

You're in so far over your head, you can't even see daylight.

Here are the growth numbers for 73-76 - what Carter inherited:

73: +5.6
74: -0.5
75: -0.2
76: +5.4

Here's 77 - 80 - what Reagan inherited:

77: +4.6
78: +5.6
79: +3.2
80: -.02

Now, then.

What were you saying? Carter inherited an economy that had 50% down years in the previous 4. Reagan inherited an economy with one flat year (two tenths of one percent down) in the previous 4.