Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
CARTER GREW THE ECONOMY MUCH BETTER THAN REAGAN
16 Feb 2014 11:05 pm
As I made clear in the OP, retard, I don't trust people JUST LIKE YOU to be honest about the numbers. People like you will bounce between sets, depending on which best serves their current argument. I mentioned both sets of numbers, and stated that I was willing to argue my thesis, to wit: THAT CARTER WAS BETTER ON THE ECONOMY THAN REAGAN, with either set of numbers BUT NOT BOTH.golfboy » 16 Feb 2014 1:43 pm » wrote: You really shouldn't be talking about people bungling numbers when YOUR bungled numbers conflict with the graph you used to support them.
You have consistently tried to use both. You use 1980 to argue that Carter left with a stagnant (not growing or shrinking) economy. You used 1981 to deprive Carter of 1976 and drop his overall performance stats.
Once you have picked ONE SET (1976-1980, or 1977-1981), I will debate the numbers with you. Until then, we will all watch you screech ineffectually and dishonestly.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?