Cannonpointer » 17 Feb 2014 3:03 pm » wrote:I will now present you with the DEFINING POST of Glory Hole Clem's career. You will be exposed to the difference between me, and the vast majority of right wing hacks on this board - the very worst elements of which are incorporated and incarnated (if he's human and not a bot) in the drivel we get from Glory Hole Clem. This is pasted from another thread:
There it is, folks. There is Glory Hole Clem, in a nut shell.
He values "accepted" opinion over GENERATED opinion. A subject cannot be argued on its merits between us. We must always defer to authority. A PROPOSITION HAS LESS VALUE OR MORE VALUE BASED ON WHO IT COMES FROM.
Just think of it. His COMPLAINT is that my sources were only cited for raw statistics, and not opinions. That was his COMPLAINT - that I made my own case instead of repeated talking points generated elsewhere.
And now you see what a chump this guy is, from his own mouth, in his own words.
Please - vote in the poll.
Hey, great job
at utterly bungling reality.
Sure,
informed, logical, sane people can argue on the merits.
But you're hopelessly ignorant, irrational and just plain insane, so the only opinion and analysis offered for your side was you. What a freaking joke.
But to answer your other compliant, yes,
appeals to credible, informed authority carries weight, duuuh, and you didn't cite one single one.
Have a nice moonbat life.