Liberal Forum

RichClem » 17 Feb 2014 3:10 pm » wrote:
Hey, great job at utterly bungling reality.

Sure, informed, logical, sane people can argue on the merits.

But you're hopelessly ignorant, irrational and just plain insane, so the only opinion and analysis offered for your side was you. What a freaking joke.

But to answer your other compliant, yes, appeals to credible, informed authority carries weight, duuuh, and you didn't cite one single one.

Have a nice moonbat life.

Yes, thank you, Glory Hole. Happily, you did NOT "bungle" it. You clarified the issue - you underscored my basic premise: That retards such as you value the SOURCE of a proposition over the LOGIC of the proposition.

Your type of thinking is what creates glass ceilings in corporations - if an opinion comes from an alpha male, it resonates with more "truthiness" than if it comes form a mere skirt. You value sources over logic, sources over argument, sources over independent judgment.

The only real objection you had to my propositions in the cited thread, if one ignores the ad hominems and appeals to "common perception" and other logical fallacies, is that the propositions COME FROM ME instead of a more "authoritative" source.

That's not argumentation but cult worship and side taking, stepson.