Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
CARTER GREW THE ECONOMY MUCH BETTER THAN REAGAN
17 Feb 2014 3:46 pm
My OP offered to argue EITHER, because I know how dishonest you are.golfboy » 17 Feb 2014 7:48 am » wrote: No, actually I used ONE set of numbers and ONLY one set of numbers, it was YOU who presented conflicting data.
Your chart uses one set of numbers, and you quoted the other. Pick one set, you don't get both.
YOU CHOOSE.
Do you want the set that turns the economy over to reagan at -.002 growth (basically, a flat economy), or do you want the one that gives Carter a lower OVERALL score?
You cannot have both, and I will argue neither with you until you agree to stick with one and only one throughout the argument.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?