18 Feb 2014 1:16 am
That in no way comments on their editorial page, which is what clemmie quotes. The pretense that rupert's paper is not partisan does not serve you, assuming you wish to be perceived as honest or intelligent.AmazonTania » 17 Feb 2014 10:22 pm » wrote:
The WSJ is one of the oldest publications for economic, market and financial analysis and information, referenced in many scholarly databases. You're going to have a difficult time convincing intellectual thinking people that one of the most used financial sources is propaganda.
Or perhaps you're basing your perception on what you believe about the WSJ from the sections they let you read for free...
You are not even aware that the federal reserve bank is a private corporation with a money issuing franchise, if I have read your posts correctly. So, what YOU find "scholarly" will not necessarily appear scholarly to people with a GENUINE education (as opposed to folks horribly ruined by indoctrination and pseudo-education).
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?