righteous » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
I UNDERSTAND YOUR POINT OF VIEW. I'LL CLARIFY MY PREVIOUS STATEMENT
CANADAS ECONOMIC SYSTEM IS PRIMARILY CAPITALIST BUT HAS A MIXED MARKET ECONOMY WITH INFLUENCES OF BOTH SOCIALISM AND CAPITALISM. WHILE NOT A SOCIALIST COUNTRY IT IS OFTEN DESCRIBED AS A SOCIAL DEMOCRACY.
I VIEW ITS PEOPLE IN VANCOUVER AND BRITISH COLUMBIA AS THE SHEEPLE OF THE COUNTRY, WHERE THERE IS THE MOST MODERN-DAY SOCIALIST INFLUENCE. THEY FOLLOW THE RULE OF TRUDEAU WHO IS THE "MODERN-DAY SOCIALIST", OF TOP-DOWN DECISION MAKING BY ELITES.
TURDeau has been flooding his country with Indians at the behest of capitalists.
I would just call him a neoliberal, globalist puppet.
Whatever "socialist" policies he supports is nominal / superficial at best. TURDeau probably doesn't even care about "ideologies" like we think about them.