Yesterday 7:45 pm
Cannonpointer » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You've been shown the data. You didn't care.
I showed you where a mere TWO female impersonators in womanface affected hundreds of girls and women, from records set to going to state matches to getting scholarships.
Your wheezy insistence that violating only a FEW women's rights - which is a lie, but even GRANTING the dishonest premise - doesn't constitute a women's rights issue is a slippery slope - just the way you like it. Slippery.
Your wife and daughter HAD a right to a dick free shower at their gym. Now they don't.
Explain to us how they didn't lose any rights.
neither my wife nor my daughter nor my daughters-in-law have ever had their rights lost.
I'll be sure to let you know when they ever do.