24 Sep 2024 8:05 pm
Then they LOST THAT RIGHT, you stupid old woman.maineman » 24 Sep 2024, 7:57 pm » wrote: ↑ IF THEY HAD A RIGHT TO SHOWER WITHOUT ONE-LEGGED TERYDACTLYLS SHOWERING WITH THEM AND NOW THEY DON'T?
That would be precisely the right they lost, in your dishonest hypothetical - the right to shower without one-legged pterodactyls.
But that is not what they lost in reality - AS YOU WELL KNOW and have just implicitly admitted.
What they lost was the right to dick free showers and sporting events (and prison cells and batter-shelters, etc).
So you are completely changing your position, then - without exhibiting the dignity to say so.maineman » 24 Sep 2024, 7:57 pm » wrote: ↑ I DOUBT ANY OF THE WOMEN IN MY LIFE PAUSE TO GIVE A FLYING **** ABOUT THEM.
Your NEW position is that they do not CARE about the rights they have lost. You are no longer lying that they lost no rights.
Does that sum it up? Or do you wish to engage in further dishonesty?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?