Yesterday 8:05 pm
maineman » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ IF THEY HAD A RIGHT TO SHOWER WITHOUT ONE-LEGGED TERYDACTLYLS SHOWERING WITH THEM AND NOW THEY DON'T?{/quote]Then they LOST THAT RIGHT, you stupid old woman.
That is precisely the right they lost - the right to shower without one-legged pterodactyls.
But that is not what they lost - AS YOU WELL KNOW.
What they lost was the right to a dick free environment.
So you are completely changing your position, then - without exhibiting the dignity to say so.maineman » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I DOUBT ANY OF THE WOMEN IN MY LIFE PAUSE TO GIVE A FLYING **** ABOUT THEM.
Your NEW position is that they do not CARE about the rights they have lost. You are no longer lying that they lost no rights.
Does that sum it up? Or do you wish to engage in further dishonesty?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?