User avatar
Cannonpointer
17 Dec 2021 7:43 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
47,162 posts
Beekeeper » 17 Dec 2021, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑ It wasn't "against the law" to do what he did. The reason- he never "took possession of the gun". In order for that to be a "straw purchase" he needed to actually take possession and "go home" with it.

Sadly, you "legal geniuses" aren't real smart when you think you are smart. Even the Judge had to dismiss the "gun possession": charge since he didn't break any laws in either obtaining it or having it in his possession.

Oops!!
The prosecutor admitted as much in open court - which admission was followed by the dismissal.
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search