DeezerShoove » 29 Sep 2024, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑
I gave up shaming assholes here for claiming "proof" when they cited peer reviewed papers and such.
That was actually a few years ago.
Peer reviews were dubious then and, as you say, have become basically useless now.
Morons can be impressed by some "Who will fact check the fact-checkers?" article written recently.
That's the trailer trash level of this issue.
Peer reviewing process went to **** under the radar long ago.
I have seen it close up myself just like you.
Peer review Definition-
"Let me give you a glowing review so I can help you get MORE FUNDING from government to produce more shambolic **** papers for you to use to keep the cycle going!! and you can do the same for me!!"
Don't doubt me here.