Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
CARTER GREW THE ECONOMY MUCH BETTER THAN REAGAN
18 Feb 2014 4:05 pm
That post was to goofy, not to you, and no - we cannot. We cannot - Goofy REFUSES to pick one set of data.tharock220 » 18 Feb 2014 4:03 pm » wrote:
We can use whatever years you want. You're not going to find anyway to spin it. Inflation adjusted income grew better under Reagan than it did under Carter, if it did at all.
Goofy insists on leaving his options open. He wants to be able to argue 1976 - 1980 when the numbers favor him that way, and use 1977 - 1981 when the numbers favor him THAT way. I insist on using only one set of numbers - and he gets to pick (see the OP, as I predicted Goofy's tricks in advance).
And yes, I CAN find a way to spin it - already have.
Reagan had a couple of trillion borrowed dollars - almost two thirds of the economy he inherited - to fall back on. When you are stealing food out of the mouths of the unborn, it's not that hard to produce some good numbers.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?