Liberal Forum

golfboy » 19 Feb 2014 12:33 pm » wrote: Did you notice that cannon gave Carter credit for 5 years, 77 through 81? No to mention the "to 154%", which clearly is dishonest, trying to make Carter's "accomplishment" look better than it was.

It is arguably acceptable to credit or blame a president for an economic trend that continues after he leaves office.

Carter's trend was DOWN, to anyone with eyes, which excludes psychotics and liars.


And anyone with the slightest knowledge about the era would immediately see that the GDP numbers aren't adjusted for inflation, assuming they're correct at all.

But psychotics bleat with glee about what a huge success Carter was.