User avatar
Blackvegetable
21 Oct 2024 10:57 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
57,332 posts
Vegas » 21 Oct 2024, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ No *******. Read all of this! Not just the first 4 words like you always do. 

 Payroll does not directly account for it. That formula does not directly relate to payroll in its calculation, but it can be indirectly connected to payroll trends. That's it! 

You are putting payroll at the center piece. It's indirectly, if at all, related. 

This is the formula you piece of ****. 

Total Jobs Created = Direct Jobs + Indirect Jobs + Induced Jobs. There is also a multiplier, but they is way over your head. 

You are wrong. You are stupid.
Total Jobs Created
Holy **** are you stupid..

Do you read your vomit before you lick it?
Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period or workers who exited the labor market entirely.
NET, you **** idiot.

You're too stupid for employment.
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search