5 Jan 2022 5:13 am
You are correct in that it WAS dimwitted ****, not even worthy of a response. But then again, isn't most responses from their ilk of that nature? No real refutation of the facts, or of the expert opinions expressed within the dozens of articles I've presented. Just a groundless dismissals of the sources or truths, mischaracterizations, and personal attacks. I've gotten so I don't even read most of it anymore.Blackvegetable » 31 Dec 2021, 5:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Dwarf,
Why am I obliged to respond to some dimwitted **** you yapped at B. See?
Because you made an *** of yourself taking a bullet for beetwat?
Psychotwatty.
We were watching Wallander.
Now I'm off to the gym.