Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
59,315 posts
B.See » 05 Jan 2022, 6:13 am » wrote: ↑
You are correct in that it WAS dimwitted ****, not even worthy of a response. But then again, isn't most responses from their ilk of that nature? No real refutation of the facts, or of the expert opinions expressed within the dozens of articles I've presented. Just a groundless dismissals of the sources or truths, mischaracterizations, and personal attacks. I've gotten so I don't even read most of it anymore.
@Huey doesn't possess the "essentials" to debate the issues.
he's just here to stalk, yap talking points, and melt down.