Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 54 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

54 minutes ago

You care enough to lie about it, Christian

I have...which is why you are going on like a raped ape.

The why of the filing matters.

The why of the filing was to deny a Rule 59 motion.

Let's try this.  Below is the first complete paragraph from page 3 of the filing.  Explain to everyone what you believe it means...paying particular attention to the portion in bold print:

The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law – a section that provides that the label “rape” as used in criminal prosecutions in New York applies only to vaginal penetration by a penis. Forcible, unconsented-to penetration of the vagina or of other bodily orifices by fingers, other body parts, or other articles or materials is not called “rape” under the New York Penal Law. It instead is labeled “sexual abuse.”1