Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

it clarifies the verdict.

As the document you're choosing not to read makes clear, the jury did not conclude that the evidence clearly indicted Grifty's small penis, rather than his small hand...the liability of his filthy digits, on the other hand, is clearly established by the jury's explicit reference to sexual assault. 

The only act of sexual assault alleged is the digital penetration.

Are you following so far?

Now, DICKFACE, I'm going to CURB STOMP YOU ONCE AGAIN over this **** of yours and why Kaplan's "reframing" of the verdict is even MORE ****!!

A. A JURY gets it's INSTRUCTIONS on verdict FROM THE JUDGE- albeit in this case, Kaplan. 

B. THAT is easily proven- Under New York criminal law, an assault constitutes "rape" only if it involves vaginal penetration by a penis. That was the definition the jury was instructed to use in the civil case. And that WAS FROM KAPLAN!!! WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS so there is NO misinterpretation of what LAW he is using in this case and in his DEFINITION OF RAPE.

C. And his "reframing" came ONLY after he got PIG STUCK by a NO RAPE OCCURRED VERDICT that he THOUGHT would happen and didn't because jurors are smarter than YOU OR KAPLAN!!

So there can be NO OTHER DEFINTION of RAPE USED for a VERDICT and the JURY FOUND THAT NO RAPE OCCURRED. PERIOD!!

CASE IS CLOSED, YOUR *** IS CURB STOMPED AND YOU ARE COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY GUTTED TO THE GILLS!!